Home Latest News NFT Basics and Opportunities Part 1 – The National Law Review

NFT Basics and Opportunities Part 1 – The National Law Review

NFTs have gone mainstream. But what are NFTs? Should your business develop its own NFT? How are they regulated? In The NFT Collection series of alerts, we will delve into these questions to help your business understand this new technology.
Non-fungible tokens, or NFTs, are digital certificates of ownership over certain, usually digital, assets that are held on a blockchain. Most commonly, NFTs are being sold in relation to digital artwork, but the underlying items could also be a video, music file, in-games items, tweets, or physical items like trainers or even property. Using blockchain technology, each NFTs contains transactional data that is open to the public and allows the owner to verify the ownership of the NFT.
Since NFTs relate to a particular underlying item, each NFT is unique and cannot be swapped for another, hence the name non-fungible (meaning non-changeable). However, an important thing to note is that users are not buying the digital work itself. What you are buying is merely a collection of code known as metadata, which links to the ‘true’ version of that work. This means that owning it might not prevent anyone else from downloading, viewing, or commercialising the digital artwork.
Last year, NFT or ‘non-fungible tokens’ sales skyrocketed so much so that the term was awarded Word of The Year by Collins Dictionary, and some of the highest value brands are exploring the potential of NFTs. According to the Financial Times, NFT sales in 2021 totalled over $40 billion with the most expensive NFTs to date being Pak’s ‘The Merge’ NFT selling for $91.8 million price tag, and Beeple’s digital art work, Everydays: The First 5,000 Days was sold for over US$69.3 million.
There are currently multiple online platforms where users can sell or purchase NFTs, the largest is OpenSea. NFTs are purchased using cryptocurrency such as ether (ETH), the default currency on the Ethereum blockchain. Unlike NFTs, cryptocurrencies are fungible, or interchangeable (but only in respect of that cryptocurrency, so, one bitcoin could be swapped for another bitcoin, but that bitcoin could then not be swapped for an ether). On the other hand, an NFT is valuable because it is non-fungible, as every NFT is unique and cannot be directly replaced by another NFT. It is in effect the digital signature of an artist, and is a means of authenticating the artwork and your ownership. Valuable, the company who minted the NFT of Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey’s first ever tweet, encapsulated the true meaning of the value behind NFTs:
Owning any digital content can be a financial investment, hold sentimental value, and create a relationship between collector and creator. Like an autograph on a baseball card, the NFT itself is the creator’s autograph on the content, making it scarce, unique, and valuable.
Jack Dorsey, CEO, Twitter
Interestingly, in May 2022, the UK’s High Court has recognised NFTs as “property” in a legal sense. The legal counsel on the case said the ruling “removes any uncertainty that NFTs are property in and of themselves, distinct from the thing they represent, under the law of England and Wales.”
NFTs present an interesting opportunity for businesses to monitories their intellectual property rights alongside other companies in the latest investment trend. The most obvious way is to sell your NFT to a third party, but further revenue can be generated by creating smart contracts which automatically make royalty payments equal to a percentage of a subsequent sale, to the original NFT seller (i.e., your business). For instance, this continuous revenue stream would be a useful avenue to explore for businesses in the gaming sector who may wish to move their digital content to a decentralised sphere, reducing their overhead while still deriving a benefit from subsequent sales.
However, when an individual purchases an NFT they take on risk as an NFT is simply unique metadata about an asset added to a blockchain – not the physical asset itself or any intellectual property rights associated with it. By way of example, the sale of Beeple’s digital artwork mentioned above did not give the owner any rights over the artwork itself, only an authorised certificate – the copyright itself remained with Beeple. It is possible to go one step further in NFT sales by simultaneously transferring the intellectual property rights associated with the underlying asset to the NFT purchaser.
It is possible to own a short text address via the Ethereum Name Service, which functions similar to the internet’s Domain Name Service. This short address can be used in place of a crypto wallet address, which are long alphanumeric strings. We would recommend that any brands considering entering the NFT space immediately register using their brand name, as there is currently little way for a brand owner to complain of a third party doing so, and this could prevent issues with consumer confusion further down the line.
Another thing to consider is the permanency of the blockchain, once an NFT exists it exists in that blockchain forever. This has several consequences the first of which being truly deleting a NFT will be impossible although it could be moved to a wallet with no or little access permissions.
Businesses can leverage the sudden popularity of NFTs to create new financial opportunities for themselves, as long as they understand the potential risks. It will be important for businesses to understand any local regulatory concerns and what the role of IP rights will be in the sale of NFTs. To assist, in our next bulletin, we will consider the regulatory considerations, or lack thereof, for a number of key jurisdictions.
About this Author
Sunny Kumar is a senior associate at the firm’s London office. He is a member of the IP procurement and portfolio management practice group.
Prior to joining the firm, Mr. Kumar served as a senior associate for a magic circle law firm based in London. Mr. Kumar is an intellectual property lawyer and advises on contentious and non-contentious trademark, copyright, patent, design, advertising, licensing, commercial and data privacy matters. He has extensive experience in working with clients on their strategic IP projects across multiple…
Georgina Rigg is an associate in the firm’s London office. She splits her practice into three core areas, namely, 1) intellectual property and commercial law including advertising, 2) EU regulatory law with a particular focus on product claims and chemicals, and 3) competition and antitrust, where the team’s unique experience in selective distribution allows her to draw on knowledge taken from each of her core areas of practice.
Kira Green is a trainee solicitor in the firm’s London office.
Kira previously completed the Summer Vacation Scheme at the firm. She worked with both the intellectual property and employment group, and helped assist by drafting marketing collateral, examining client designs, and proofreading documents.
Ryan Mullen is a trainee solicitor at the firm’s London office. He is a member of the Oil and Gas and Construction practice groups.
Prior to joining the firm, Ryan spent a year working as a Legal Secretary at the local criminal and property law firm KK & Co Solicitors in Newcastle upon Tyne. In this role, he managed client relationships, office administration, and legal documentation submission to the criminal courts.
 
As a woman owned company, The National Law Review is a certified member of the Women's Business Enterprise National Council
You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review’s (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC’s  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  
Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be  a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 
Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.
The National Law Review – National Law Forum LLC 3 Grant Square #141 Hinsdale, IL 60521  Telephone  (708) 357-3317 or toll free (877) 357-3317.  If you would ike to contact us via email please click here.

source

Previous articleHere's how much the iPhone 14 lineup and the new Apple Watches cost around the world – comments – GSMArena.com
Next articleOne-third of Vizio customers still using cable or satellite, CFO says – FierceVideo
An Open Source activist, who pursues his passion for tech blogging. In early years of his life, he worked as market analyst for a number of companies. Martin has been writing reviews and articles for a local magazine for last five years.