NASA has been focusing a vast majority of their research and energy on understanding Mars, and possibly examining whether the Red Planet could support life today, or even could support life at one time. However, the powers to be at NASA believe that as it relates to putting human life on another planet – the answer is Venus instead of Mars. While the Red Planet may seem like the obvious choice, Venus is actually significantly better for a number of reasons.

First though it has to be understood what exactly NASA is aiming to do. They’ve coined what they want to create at Venus as a “Cloud City,” and it will be almost exactly as it sounds. It all revolves around the High Altitude Venus Operational Concept, or HAVOC, and it’s a spacecraft that is still in the conceptual design phase. Scientists would be able to sit in the HAVOC spacecraft, just above the acidic clouds of Venus, and collect information from the planet.

The craft would likely sit 30 miles above the surface, and at that height – Venus doesn’t differ that much from Earth. A slightly lower gravity, and an atmospheric pressure that rivals Earth as well. The temperature would be around 75 degrees Celsius – which would be uncomfortable, but not something a trained astronaut manning the mission couldn’t handle.

Mermaid like sailfish found at 8143 meters below sea level in Mariana Trench (+video)

The missions would start out as educational, to really learn more about the planet and how it functions – but after that would be to develop a long term plan for a group of people to live and provide permanent housing. Even better, the technology that is going to be used on this type of craft already exists, or is exceptionally close to being in existence. Meaning, the technology that would be used to make this type of craft happen – would not be technology years, and years out.

Champagne bubbles or Ostwald ripening can end world’s energy crisis (+video)

However, they did note that this would take at least a decade, or two to come to fruition. The spacecraft would also house a 130 meter Zeppelin that would be filled with helium, and solar panels for power taking advantage of the Sun. The spacecraft’s would essentially be like floating blimps above Venus, and would ultimately pave the way to making science-fiction come to fruition.



    • You’d better send an email to NASA and inform them before they start wasting all this money on something that they can achieve the same scientific results with by not using humans.
      They’re going to feel like idiots when they realize they could have gotten the same results without sending humans there, but will be grateful for the money saved I’m sure.

      • At Venus there would be no possible way for them to leave the ship–thus everything they could do would be done with instruments and sensors–why on Earth would there be a need for people–and we still need to address just how they plan to get enough fuel to lift them “back up” to earth–fighting the Sun’s gravity every inch of the way

  1. Yes, those who write articles should have correct spelling, especially in the title. Very embarrassing. As for the content, I concur that high altitude lighter-than-air is a good idea, although it may be better to hold out for nano-structured vacuum enclosures. For Venus, a few teams of scientists would suffice, and they may not be needed since robotic missions are equally competent from high altitude. However, to think that this is how people might want to actually live (“cloud city”) is ludicrous.

  2. Could City. Right. Good spell-checking. Why don’t you proofread your articles? Espcially the title. Try learning from your mistakes instead of ignoring them, k thanks?


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here