Elon Musk's offer to buy Twitter was initially met with resistance.
In fact, Twitter evoked a "poison pill" provision to stop Musk from forcibly buying the company.
Eventually the company accepted the offer – a deal that Musk greeted with a one word tweet. "Yesss!!!"
🚀💫♥️ Yesss!!! ♥️💫🚀 pic.twitter.com/0T9HzUHuh6
A few weeks later though, Mr Musk appeared to have developed buyer's remorse. Having done all the running, having got what he wanted, he now had some questions.
"Twitter deal temporarily on hold pending details supporting calculation that spam/fake accounts do indeed represent less than 5% of users" he tweeted..
Mr Musk was arguing that Twitter had no way of verifying how many of its 229m daily active users were actually human.
Twitter's CEO, Parag Agrawal, answered back with a 13-tweet thread – publicly stating that fewer than 5% of its accounts were bots.
Our actual internal estimates for the last four quarters were all well under 5% – based on the methodology outlined above. The error margins on our estimates give us confidence in our public statements each quarter.
Elon Musk responded with a turd emoji.
That was on 16 May, and it appears not much has changed since then.
In Musk's filing to the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on Friday he said he had "repeatedly" requested further information on spam accounts – data that was not forthcoming.
Yet sceptics argue that Musk's interest in bots is a distraction.
Twitter is well known for having a significant number of fake accounts.
In fact, Twitter announced on Thursday that it removes a million bot accounts every day.
Twitter would readily have admitted it had a relatively small but persistent bot problem before Musk put in an offer.
Instead it's posited that bot and spam accounts are being weaponised by Musk, as an exit ramp out of this deal.
When Musk first looked into buying Twitter the tech economy was in a very different place.
At the end of March Tesla stock, which is the driver of most of Musk's fortune, was worth well over $1,000 (£830) a share.
Musk was feeling bullish. But since April, Tesla has lost about a third of its value. Many other tech stocks have also done poorly.
Musk's deal – that valued Twitter at $44bn (£36bn) – started to seem a little steep.
Many Tesla shareholders also began to worry that Musk's time, already spread between his companies Neuralink, Space X, the Boring Company and Tesla, would be spread even thinner with the acquisition of Twitter. It's difficult to see how it wouldn't.
Musk had other problems too. He claimed he wanted to take over Twitter because it had lost its way. He wanted Twitter to champion "free speech".
And yet he struggled to define how he was going to effectively moderate the platform to that end.
"By 'free speech', I simply mean that which matches the law," he tweeted.
By “free speech”, I simply mean that which matches the law.
I am against censorship that goes far beyond the law.
If people want less free speech, they will ask government to pass laws to that effect.
Therefore, going beyond the law is contrary to the will of the people.
But critics argued that that definition was naive. For one it would encourage countries to pass laws that restricted free speech. It would also cause a moderation nightmare – with different tweets being assessed in real-time for whether they broke the law (or not) in hundreds of jurisdictions.
And then there was Twitter itself. Musk never ingratiated himself to the bulk of Twitter's employees. He said that Twitter clearly had a "left wing bias" and joked that its head office could be used as a homeless shelter. Many Twitter workers were worried that his swashbuckling approach could undo years of carefully-thought-out moderation policy.
And as for Mr Musk's plan for Twitter? Well he had an ambitious growth forecast. In fact, he claimed he wanted to grow Twitter's userbase from 200 million to over 900 million in 2028.
Yet there was no clear vision of how he was going to do that. It felt like numbers picked almost at random.
To Musk's critics, he had bought a company at a high price, a company whose employees mostly didn't like him, and a company that he had struggled to present a coherent vision for.
To his supporters, Musk was going to change Twitter for the better. Donald Trump would be invited back. Twitter's overzealous restrictions on free speech would be reined in. Its inherent left-wing bias would be addressed. Mr Musk may now never get the chance to enact that change.
But this deal isn't over.
Twitter has already claimed that Musk is legally committed to buying the company – at the price agreed.
Twitter board member Bret Taylor has said they will take the matter to court.
The Twitter Board is committed to closing the transaction on the price and terms agreed upon with Mr. Musk and plans to pursue legal action to enforce the merger agreement. We are confident we will prevail in the Delaware Court of Chancery.
It raises the bizarre spectre that Elon Musk could, unwillingly, end up buying a $44 billion company – an extraordinary thing.
A lot is still on the line. One thing is pretty clear though, this story is about more than bots.
James Clayton is the BBC's North America technology reporter based in San Francisco. Follow him on Twitter @jamesclayton5.
Elon Musk pulls out of $44bn deal to buy Twitter
Musk threatens to walk away from Twitter deal
Twitter investor sues Elon Musk over takeover bid
Twitter hits back on Musk doubts over fake accounts
X marks the spot for Musk's Twitter growth plans
Elon Musk strikes deal to buy Twitter for $44bn
Russia will try to find remnants of downed drone
US accuses Chinese tycoon of billion-dollar fraud
Ukraine invites DeSantis after he calls war 'dispute'
Is conflict between China and the West getting closer?
Drone crash is a moment fraught with danger
On the prowl for the wolves returning to Europe
India farmers march in protest as onions rot
Hanging the mic up after 30 years of reporting
The long wait for justice over apartheid crimes
Could waste plastic become a useful fuel source?
When might the asteroid hit Earth? Our quiz…
The King and his kids – inside Hagi's plan to restore Romania's glory
The effect of TikTok's beauty filters
The 1991 video game phenomenon
The return of the US' lost language
© 2023 BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read about our approach to external linking.