Home Latest News Are Active Funds Dependent on Mega-Caps? – Morningstar

Are Active Funds Dependent on Mega-Caps? – Morningstar


Get 14 Days Free

Ollie Smith: Now, despite a dramatic start to the year, long-term investors in mega-cap tech stocks can still be pleased with some absolutely stellar returns overall. But can active funds outperform without owning them? That’s the question I’m asking Morningstar’s Senior Investment Research Analyst, Lena Tsymbaluk, today.
Lena, why is this issue not just a question of the so-called “FAANG” stocks?
Lena Tsymbaluk: Good afternoon, Ollie. Yes. So, you may know that for the last 10 years, the US equity market has been dominated by a few technology and growth stocks. There are a few acronyms actually for those names and many of you will know FAANGs, for example.
But today, we are going to talk about MAMATA, which are the six largest growth stocks in the S&P 500. They are Microsoft, Apple, Meta, Alphabet, Tesla and Amazon. So, these names have driven a lot of the US market performance recently. For example, over the last five years, MAMATA have been responsible for a third of the S&P 500 Index’s performance and half of the Russell 1000 Growth Index’s performance. These names have benefited from work-from-home and shop-from-home environment and have become even larger positions in the index.
For example, at the moment, MAMATA make up around a quarter of the S&P 500 and more than 40% of the Russell 1000 Growth Index’s weight. So, the concentration risk has made it actually greater in the growth benchmark and because of UCITS 10/40 rule, which means that no more than 10% can be invested in one stock, fund managers can’t own Apple or Microsoft at their current weights as they are 12% and 11% of the index right now, let alone overweight them.
OS: And here’s the big question. Can active managers actually outperform without holding them? What’s your take on this?
LT: It is an interesting question. The short answer is: it is not really easy to beat the index in the US equity space unfortunately, as it is such an efficient market, and the concentration has made it even more difficult. Only a quarter of funds in the US blend category have managed to outperform the S&P 500 Index over the last five years, and only a fifth of US growth funds have managed to outperform the Russell 1000 Growth Index, which is the (indiscernible) growth index.
In our study of US blend category, we found out that if a fund was more than 4% underweight MAMATA over five years, it was pretty much bound to underperform. For the growth category to outperform the growth benchmark, the funds had to venture into even growthier stocks. For example, the Silver-rated Morgan Stanley US Growth and the Gold-rated PGIM Jennison US Growth funds have benefited – have actually significantly outperformed the S&P 500 and the Growth Index. And what helped them was investing in less established companies in relatively early stages of their growth and having slightly higher growth profiles.
OS: So, what does this mean for the value rotation then? Does that mean that investor enthusiasm about it is, kind of, overdone, so to speak?
LT: Yes. So, when it comes to US value investing, there is a whole different dynamic there anyway. Out of MAMATA, the only representative of the value index, which is Russell 1000 Value, is Alphabet, which is only 1%. The value index is also much more diversified compared to its growth equivalent. While growth style has been outperforming value in the last five years, more recently, there has been a rotation towards value as you rightly said. And in fact, all the MAMATA names – Microsoft, Apple, Meta, Alphabet, Tesla and Amazon – I’ll repeat them – delivered negative returns year-to-date. That’s why we believe if investors want to achieve core US exposure, they need to pair growth and value styles.
OS: Excellent. Many thanks for that, Lena. For more on equity research and funds, check out our weekly Tuesday updates on Morningstar.co.uk. Until next time, I’ve been Ollie Smith for Morningstar.
The information contained within is for educational and informational purposes ONLY. It is not intended nor should it be considered an invitation or inducement to buy or sell a security or securities noted within nor should it be viewed as a communication intended to persuade or incite you to buy or sell security or securities noted within. Any commentary provided is the opinion of the author and should not be considered a personalised recommendation. The information contained within should not be a person’s sole basis for making an investment decision. Please contact your financial professional before making an investment decision.

An incensed Elon Musk took to Twitter last week to berate S&P over its ESG decisions, but …

A bear market is the perfect time to look under the hood of your portfolio and financial…


These investment trusts have seen strong long-term gains by investing in UK stocks

VIDEO: After his speech at the Morningstar Italy Awards for Investing Excellence 2022, we…

Manager research team analyst Sam Meakin joins Ollie Smith for another look at three exciting …
Mining companies are operating in a challenging environment but could now be the time to top up o…
THE WEEK: Morningstar columnist Rodney Hobson provides two pieces of advice to George Osborne, an…
Businesses that have competitive advantages within their industry are good candidates for dividen…
Morningstar reveals the top 10 best performers over the last five years
Morningstar OBSR reveals the top funds for investors seeking exposure to European equities
Repeated gaffes have left the chancellor scrambling for credibility  
From Sunak shelling out to Musk’s latest lawsuit, we’ve learned a lot this week
We have all the analysis and reaction of the main points of the Chancellor’s well trailed measure…
We’ve mapped out the European companies that could be a solid buying opportunity 
It is always a good time to brush up on what constitutes good hygiene when transacting exchange t…
Ollie Smith  is editor of Morningstar UK
About Us
Connect With Us
Get Help
Terms of Use        Privacy Policy        Modern Slavery Statement        Cookie Settings
The Morningstar Star Rating for Stocks is assigned based on an analyst’s estimate of a stocks fair value. It is projection/opinion and not a statement of fact. Morningstar assigns star ratings based on an analyst’s estimate of a stock’s fair value. Four components drive the Star Rating: (1) our assessment of the firm’s economic moat, (2) our estimate of the stock’s fair value, (3) our uncertainty around that fair value estimate and (4) the current market price. This process culminates in a single-point star rating that is updated daily. A 5-star represents a belief that the stock is a good value at its current price; a 1-star stock isn’t. If our base-case assumptions are true the market price will converge on our fair value estimate over time, generally within three years. Investments in securities are subject to market and other risks. Past performance of a security may or may not be sustained in future and is no indication of future performance. For detail information about the Morningstar Star Rating for Stocks, please visit here
Quantitative Fair Value Estimate represents Morningstar’s estimate of the per share dollar amount that a company’s equity is worth today. The Quantitative Fair Value Estimate is based on a statistical model derived from the Fair Value Estimate Morningstar’s equity analysts assign to companies which includes a financial forecast of the company. The Quantitative Fair Value Estimate is calculated daily. It is a projection/opinion and not a statement of fact. Investments in securities are subject to market and other risks. Past performance of a security may or may not be sustained in future and is no indication of future performance. For detail information about the Quantiative Fair Value Estimate, please visit here


Previous articleMetaverse App BUD Raises $36.8M, Plans NFT Marketplace – PYMNTS.com
Next articleCan I Download Someone Else's Instagram Story? How To Save Them For Posterity – Bustle
She has been writing columns on consumer gadgets for over 2 years now. Her areas of interest include smartphones, tablets, mobile operating systems and apps. She holds an M.C.S. degree from Texas A&M University.