Apache Pinot vs Timeplus
| Apache Pinot | Timeplus | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Free trial | No | Yes |
| Paid from | Free | $199/mo |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | api, self-hosted, Web | api, Linux, macOS, self-hosted, Web, Windows |
| Deployment | self_hosted | hybrid |
| Query language | sql | sql |
| Real-time ingestion | Yes | Yes |
| Row-level security | Yes | Yes |
| Embedded analytics | Yes | — |
| Data source coverage | Streaming: Kafka, Pulsar, Kinesis; batch: Hadoop, Spark, Amazon S3, Azure ADLS, Google Cloud Storage | Streaming platforms, databases, files, APIs, SaaS connectors, and external analytics tools |
| Free plan | — | No |
| Paid from | — | 199 /mo |
| Included users | — | 20 users |
Both are listed in Best OLAP Software, Best Streaming Analytics Software. On Inferse, Apache Pinot scores higher on our published basis.