A5:SQL Mk-2 vs RazorSQL
| A5:SQL Mk-2 | RazorSQL | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | No |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | — | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Windows | Windows, macOS, Linux |
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Deployment | desktop | desktop |
| Database support | Oracle, Microsoft SQL Server, IBM DB2, PostgreSQL, MySQL, InterBase/Firebird, SQLite, Microsoft Access, and other OLE DB- or ODBC-compatible databases | Amazon Athena, Amazon Aurora, BigQuery, Cassandra, CockroachDB, Couchbase, Databricks, DB2, Derby, Druid, DuckDB, DynamoDB, Firebird, Greenplum, H2, HBase, Hive, HSQLDB, Informix, Ingres, InterBase, IRIS, JavaDB, kdb+, Keyspaces, MariaDB, MonetDB, MongoDB, MySQL, Netezza, OpenBase, Oracle, Paradox, Pervasive, PostgreSQL, Redshift, Salesforce, SAP HANA, SimpleDB, Snowflake |
| SSH tunneling | Yes | Yes |
| Data editing | Yes | Yes |
| Visual query builder | Yes | Yes |
| Result export formats | CSV, XML Spreadsheet, INSERT statements, Excel | Delimited File, SQL Insert Statements, HTML, XML, XLSX, XLS, Text |
| Query history | Yes | Yes |
Both are listed in Best Database Client Software. On Inferse, A5:SQL Mk-2 scores higher on our published basis.