Actian Zen vs Chroma
| Actian Zen | Chroma | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | — | $250/mo |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Linux, Windows, macOS | Android, api, iOS, Linux, macOS, self-hosted, Web, Windows |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Paid from | 417 /mo | 250 /mo |
| Deployment | both | both |
| Hybrid search | Yes | Yes |
| Metadata filtering | Yes | Yes |
| Index types | HNSW, flat | VectorIndex, SparseVectorIndex, FtsIndex, StringInvertedIndex, IntInvertedIndex, FloatInvertedIndex, BoolInvertedIndex |
| SDK languages | Python, JavaScript, C++ | Python, TypeScript, Rust, Kotlin, Swift |
| Sparse vectors | — | Yes |
| Maximum dimensions | — | 4,096 dimensions |
Both are listed in Best Vector Database Hosting. On Inferse, Chroma scores higher on our published basis.