Actian Zen vs KDB.AI
| Actian Zen | KDB.AI | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Free trial | Yes | Yes |
| Paid from | — | Free |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Android, api, iOS, Linux, macOS, self-hosted, Windows | api, self-hosted, Web |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Paid from | 417 /mo | — |
| Deployment | both | both |
| Hybrid search | Yes | Yes |
| Metadata filtering | Yes | Yes |
| Index types | HNSW, flat | Flat, qFlat, IVF, IVFPQ, HNSW, qHNSW, BM25 |
| SDK languages | Python, JavaScript, C++ | Python, q |
| Sparse vectors | — | Yes |
Both are listed in Best Vector Database Hosting. On Inferse, KDB.AI scores higher on our published basis.