Aedes vs IronMQ
| Aedes | IronMQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | Free | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | api, self-hosted | — |
| Deployment model | self_hosted | hybrid |
| Delivery guarantees | configurable | — |
| Supported protocols | MQTT 3.1; MQTT 3.1.1; TCP; TLS; WebSocket; Bridge Protocol | HTTP/REST, Amazon SQS, OpenStack Marconi |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Paid from | — | 399 /mo |
| Dead-letter queues | — | Yes |
| Ordering guarantees | — | per_queue |
Both are listed in Best Message Broker Software. On Inferse, Aedes scores higher on our published basis.