AlloyDB AI vs Chroma
| AlloyDB AI | Chroma | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | — | $250/mo |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Web | Android, api, iOS, Linux, macOS, self-hosted, Web, Windows |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Paid from | — | 250 /mo |
| Deployment | — | both |
| Hybrid search | — | Yes |
| Metadata filtering | — | Yes |
| Sparse vectors | — | Yes |
| Maximum dimensions | — | 4,096 dimensions |
| Index types | — | VectorIndex, SparseVectorIndex, FtsIndex, StringInvertedIndex, IntInvertedIndex, FloatInvertedIndex, BoolInvertedIndex |
| SDK languages | — | Python, TypeScript, Rust, Kotlin, Swift |
Both are listed in Best Vector Database Hosting. On Inferse, Chroma scores higher on our published basis.