AmorphousDiskMark vs ZBrush
| AmorphousDiskMark | ZBrush | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | — | Free |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | macOS | Windows, macOS |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Workload areas | sequential read/write; random read/write; storage throughput; IOPS | CPU rendering; GPU rendering; ray tracing; shader execution; geometry processing; lighting; global illumination; scene complexity |
| Operating systems | macOS 10.9 or later | Windows; macOS |
| Custom test profiles | Yes | Yes |
| Result export formats | — | none documented; results are not saved as a file |
| CLI or automation | — | Yes |
Both are listed in Best PC Benchmark Software. On Inferse, ZBrush scores higher on our published basis.