Anti-Twin vs Duplicate Cleaner
| Anti-Twin | Duplicate Cleaner | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Free trial | No | Yes |
| Paid from | Free | Free |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Linux, macOS, Windows | Windows |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Platform coverage | cross-platform | windows |
| Scan locations | local hard disks, USB flash disks, memory cards, shared network folders, second folder/path | Local folders and drives; network/UNC paths; portable devices; ZIP and other archives |
| Match methods | file names, byte-by-byte file content, binary similarity, pixel-based image comparison | File content hashes or byte comparison; file name, extension, size, dates, folder and drive attributes; image similarity and metadata; audio data and tags; video frames, soundtrack and metadata |
| Automatic selection | Yes | Yes |
| Recycle Bin / Trash | Yes | Yes |
| File preview | — | Yes |
| Folder exclusions | — | Yes |
Both are listed in Best Duplicate File Finders. On Inferse, Duplicate Cleaner scores higher on our published basis.