Apache Artemis vs NanoMQ
| Apache Artemis | NanoMQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | Free | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | api, Linux, macOS, self-hosted, Windows | Windows, Linux |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Deployment model | self_hosted | self_hosted |
| Delivery guarantees | configurable | configurable |
| Dead-letter queues | Yes | — |
| Ordering guarantees | per_queue | — |
| Supported protocols | AMQP, MQTT, STOMP, OpenWire, Core | MQTT, ZeroMQ, nanomsg, NNG, WebSocket, SOME/IP, DDS, MQTT over QUIC |
Both are listed in Best Message Broker Software. On Inferse, Apache Artemis scores higher on our published basis.