Appsurify TestBrain vs HyperExecute
| Appsurify TestBrain | HyperExecute | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Free trial | Yes | Yes |
| Paid from | — | $103,129/mo |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | api, self-hosted, Web | api, Linux, macOS, self-hosted, Web, Windows |
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Flake detection | Yes | Yes |
| Quarantine workflow | Yes | Yes |
| Failure clustering | Yes | Yes |
| Rerun policies | Yes | Yes |
| Supported frameworks | Cypress.io, Playwright, Selenium, Appium, Cucumber, Behave, Maven, Ant, JUnit, TestNG, NUnit, XUnit, MSTest, VSTest, SmartBear TestComplete, Sahi, Mocha, Katalon Studio, KIF, Ruby, C#, Java, Robot Framework, Pytest, Ranorex, Webest, Jasmine, Opentest, iOS, Android, Espresso, XcodeTest/XCUITest, EarlGrey, Applitools, Testim | Selenium, Playwright, Puppeteer, Cypress, Appium, Espresso, Maestro, XCUI, TestNG, JUnit, Cucumber, WebdriverIO, Protractor, Nightwatch, BiDi, NUnit, SpecFlow, PyUnit, PyTest, Robot, Behave, Ruby, Capybara, Jest, Mocha, CodeceptJs, JMeter, Gatling |
| Issue tracker links | Yes | Yes |
Both are listed in Best Test Flakiness Management Software. On Inferse, HyperExecute scores higher on our published basis.