arcdEx vs w3m
| arcdEx | w3m | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | Free | — |
| Open source | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Linux | Linux |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Asset types | Defold archives, archive indexes, manifests, compiled Lua files, texture resources | — |
| Game file formats | .arcd, .arci, .dmanifest, .texturec, .luac | — |
| Texture formats | .texturec, Basis UASTC, .basis | — |
| Batch extraction | Yes | — |
| Command-line support | Yes | — |
| Archive repacking | No | — |
Both are listed in Best Game Asset Extractors. On Inferse, w3m scores higher on our published basis.