Artie vs Tungsten Replicator
| Artie | Tungsten Replicator | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Free trial | Yes | No |
| Paid from | $500/mo | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | api, self-hosted, Web | Linux |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Paid from | 500 /mo | — |
| Change data capture | Yes | Yes |
| Replication direction | one-way | multi-way |
| Deployment options | hybrid | hybrid |
| Supported databases | PostgreSQL, MySQL, MariaDB, Microsoft SQL Server, Oracle, MongoDB, DocumentDB, CockroachDB, DynamoDB, Amazon Keyspaces, PlanetScale, Supabase, Aurora/RDS, and Cloud SQL | MySQL, MariaDB, Percona, Amazon Aurora/RDS, Google Cloud SQL, Microsoft Azure, Oracle, PostgreSQL, Amazon Redshift, HPE Vertica, Hadoop, MongoDB, Apache Kafka, Amazon S3 |
| Data transformations | Yes | Yes |
| Cross-region replication | — | Yes |
Both are listed in Best Database Replication Software, Best Data Replication Software. On Inferse, Artie scores higher on our published basis.