AURIX Development Studio vs MCUXpresso SDK
| AURIX Development Studio | MCUXpresso SDK | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | Free | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Windows | extension, Linux, macOS, Web, Windows |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Debugger included | Yes | Yes |
| SDK components | Over 150 peripheral Components; communications library for I2C, USB, UART, SPI, CAN, LIN, and Bluetooth Low Energy; analog peripherals; dynamically generated APIs; Peripheral Driver Library | CMSIS; peripheral drivers; device headers; RTOS; connectivity stacks; AI inference and neural-network libraries; audio; security and cryptography; graphics; motor control; file systems; storage; examples |
| Target architectures | 8051; Arm Cortex-M0/M0+; Arm Cortex-M3; Arm Cortex-M4 | Arm Cortex-M; 32-bit digital signal controllers |
| Host platforms | Windows | Windows; macOS; Linux |
| Build systems | Native PSoC Creator project build; exported Makefile workflow | CMake; Kconfig; west; Ninja; IDE project generation |
| Debug interfaces | CMSIS-DAP; KitProg2; KitProg3; PSoC Programmer | LinkServer; SEGGER J-Link; GDB |
| License model | free proprietary | open-source |
Both are listed in Best Embedded Systems Toolchains. On Inferse, AURIX Development Studio scores higher on our published basis.