Azure Machine Configuration vs Quattor
Azure Machine Configuration
5.3 #16 in Configuration Management Tools
About Azure Machine Configuration| Azure Machine Configuration | Quattor | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | $6/mo | Free |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Web | Linux, self-hosted |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Paid from | 6 /mo | — |
| Deployment model | cloud | self_hosted |
| Agent model | agent_based | agent_based |
| Drift detection | Yes | — |
| Patch management | No | Yes |
| Policy as code | Yes | Yes |
| Compliance reporting | Yes | — |
| Supported platforms | AlmaLinux 9; Amazon Linux 2; Ubuntu Server 16.04–24.x; Debian 10.x–13.x; CBL-Mariner 1–2; Azure Linux 3; Windows 10–11; Windows Server 2012–2025; Oracle Linux 7.x–9.x; CentOS 7.3–8.x; RHEL 7.4–10.x; Rocky Linux 8–9; SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP5 and 15.x | Enterprise Linux (EL), including Rocky Linux and AlmaLinux |
Both are listed in Best Configuration Management Tools. On Inferse, Quattor scores higher on our published basis.