BinderHub vs Deepnote
| BinderHub | Deepnote | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Free trial | No | Yes |
| Paid from | Free | $3,920/mo |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | api, self-hosted, Web | api, extension, Linux, macOS, self-hosted, Web, Windows |
| Execution model | hosted | hybrid |
| Supported languages | Python, R, Julia, Octave, Rust, Fortran, C, Cython | Python, SQL, R, Stata |
| Notebook formats | Jupyter Notebook (.ipynb) | .deepnote, .ipynb, .qmd, .py (Percent/Marimo), PDF |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Paid from | — | 39 /user/mo |
| Real-time collaboration | — | Yes |
| Version history | — | Yes |
| GPU compute | — | Yes |
Both are listed in Best Notebook Software. On Inferse, Deepnote scores higher on our published basis.