Buildbarn vs EngFlow Remote Caching
| Buildbarn | EngFlow Remote Caching | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Free trial | No | Yes |
| Paid from | — | Free |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Linux | api, Linux, macOS, self-hosted, Web, Windows |
| Cache scope | both | remote |
| Self-hosted option | Yes | Yes |
| Supported build systems | Bazel, Buck2, BuildStream, recc, Pants, Goma | Bazel, BuildStream, Goma Server, Pants, Please, Recc, Soong, CMake, Gradle |
| CI platform support | GitHub Actions | GitHub Actions, Buildkite |
| Remote execution | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Yes | — |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Compiler/language support | — | C/C++ with GCC, Clang, or MSVC; Java |
Both are listed in Best Build Cache Software. On Inferse, EngFlow Remote Caching scores higher on our published basis.