Buildless vs EngFlow Remote Caching
| Buildless | EngFlow Remote Caching | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Free trial | No | Yes |
| Paid from | Free | Free |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | api, Web | api, Linux, macOS, self-hosted, Web, Windows |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Cache scope | remote | remote |
| Self-hosted option | Yes | Yes |
| Supported build systems | Gradle, Maven, Turborepo, Bazel, CCache, SCCache | Bazel, BuildStream, Goma Server, Pants, Please, Recc, Soong, CMake, Gradle |
| Compiler/language support | Java, Kotlin, C, C++, Swift, JavaScript, TypeScript, Rust | C/C++ with GCC, Clang, or MSVC; Java |
| Remote execution | No | Yes |
| CI platform support | — | GitHub Actions, Buildkite |
Both are listed in Best Build Cache Software. On Inferse, Buildless scores higher on our published basis.