BullseyeCoverage vs c8
| BullseyeCoverage | c8 | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | No |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | — | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Windows, macOS, Linux | — |
| Free plan | No | — |
| Coverage types | function coverage; condition/decision coverage | lines, functions, branches, statements |
| Supported languages | C; C++ | JavaScript, TypeScript, JSX |
| Report formats | HTML; text; annotated source code; XML; Cobertura; CSV | text, Istanbul-compatible reporters, v8, console-details |
| Pull-request annotations | — | No |
| Self-hosted option | — | No |
| Historical trends | — | No |
| Coverage gates | — | Yes |
Both are listed in Best Test Coverage Tools. On Inferse, c8 scores higher on our published basis.