c8 vs dotCover
| c8 | dotCover | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | No |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | — | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | — | Windows, macOS, Linux |
| Coverage types | lines, functions, branches, statements | statement, unit-test, application/manual |
| Supported languages | JavaScript, TypeScript, JSX | C#, F#, VB.NET |
| Report formats | text, Istanbul-compatible reporters, v8, console-details | HTML, XML, JSON, XML for NDepend |
| Pull-request annotations | No | — |
| Self-hosted option | No | — |
| Historical trends | No | — |
| Coverage gates | Yes | — |
| Free plan | — | No |
Both are listed in Best Test Coverage Tools. On Inferse, c8 scores higher on our published basis.