Canonical OpenStack vs Stakater Cloud Orchestrator
| Canonical OpenStack | Stakater Cloud Orchestrator | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | Free | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | api, Linux, self-hosted, Web | api, self-hosted, Web |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Cloud coverage | hybrid | hybrid |
| Provisioning automation | Yes | Yes |
| Self-service catalog | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment model | self_hosted | self_hosted |
| Cloud providers | — | AWS, Azure, Google Cloud, Red Hat OpenShift, IBM Fusion, SUSE Rancher, CNCF-conformant Kubernetes |
| Policy governance | — | Yes |
| Infrastructure as code | — | Yes |
Both are listed in Best Cloud Management Software. On Inferse, Canonical OpenStack scores higher on our published basis.