Canto vs Dropmark
| Canto | Dropmark | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Free trial | No | Yes |
| Paid from | — | $0.33/mo |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | api | api, extension, iOS, macOS, Web |
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Supported asset types | Images (.JPEG, .JPG, .BMP, .TIFF, .PNG, .SVG, .WEBP, .EPS, .HEIC), raw camera files, video, audio, documents, Adobe Creative Suite files, Apple application files, subtitles, fonts, and email files | images, videos, audio, documents, links, text |
| Metadata and tagging | Yes | Yes |
| Approval workflows | Yes | — |
| Version history | Yes | — |
| Guest sharing | Yes | Yes |
| API access | Yes | Yes |
| Storage limit | — | 50 GB |
Both are listed in Best Digital Asset Management Software. On Inferse, Canto scores higher on our published basis.