cargo-llvm-cov vs NCover
| cargo-llvm-cov | NCover | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | No |
| Free trial | No | Yes |
| Paid from | — | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Windows, macOS, Linux | extension, self-hosted, Windows |
| Coverage types | line, region, function, branch, MC/DC | sequence point, branch, method, condition, symbol, line, cyclomatic complexity |
| Supported languages | Rust, C, C++ | C#, VB.NET, C++/CLI, other .NET CLI languages |
| Report formats | HTML, text, JSON, LCOV, Cobertura, Codecov Custom Coverage | HTML, XML, JSON, CSV, NCover v3 XML |
| Self-hosted option | Yes | Yes |
| Coverage gates | Yes | Yes |
| Free plan | — | No |
| Historical trends | — | Yes |
Both are listed in Best Test Coverage Tools. On Inferse, NCover scores higher on our published basis.