cdist vs Puppet
| cdist | Puppet | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | No |
| Free trial | No | Yes |
| Paid from | — | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Linux, macOS | api, Linux, macOS, self-hosted, Web, Windows |
| Deployment model | self_hosted | self_hosted |
| Agent model | agentless | both |
| Patch management | Yes | Yes |
| Policy as code | Yes | Yes |
| Supported platforms | Alpine Linux, Archlinux, CentOS, Debian, Devuan, Fedora, FreeBSD, Gentoo, Mac OS X, NetBSD, OpenBSD, Redhat, Ubuntu, XenServer | Debian, Fedora, macOS, Microsoft Windows, Windows Server, Red Hat Enterprise Linux, Amazon Linux, SUSE Linux Enterprise Server, Alma Linux, Rocky Linux, Oracle Linux, Ubuntu |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Drift detection | — | Yes |
| Compliance reporting | — | Yes |
Both are listed in Best Configuration Management Tools. On Inferse, Puppet scores higher on our published basis.