Cello CNI vs Liqo
| Cello CNI | Liqo | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | Free | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Linux, self-hosted | Linux, macOS, self-hosted, Windows |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| CNI plugin | Yes | — |
| Network policies | Yes | — |
| Supported platforms | Kubernetes, Volcengine ECS, veLinux 1.0, Linux | Kubernetes; Kubeadm; K3s; K0s; AKS; EKS; GKE; Aruba Cloud KaaS; OpenShift |
| Multi-cluster networking | — | Yes |
| Encryption in transit | — | Yes |
Both are listed in Best Container Networking Software. On Inferse, Cello CNI scores higher on our published basis.