Chroma vs KDB.AI
| Chroma | KDB.AI | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Free trial | No | Yes |
| Paid from | $250/mo | Free |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Android, api, iOS, Linux, macOS, self-hosted, Web, Windows | api, self-hosted, Web |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Paid from | 250 /mo | — |
| Deployment | both | both |
| Hybrid search | Yes | Yes |
| Metadata filtering | Yes | Yes |
| Sparse vectors | Yes | Yes |
| Maximum dimensions | 4,096 dimensions | — |
| Index types | VectorIndex, SparseVectorIndex, FtsIndex, StringInvertedIndex, IntInvertedIndex, FloatInvertedIndex, BoolInvertedIndex | Flat, qFlat, IVF, IVFPQ, HNSW, qHNSW, BM25 |
| SDK languages | Python, TypeScript, Rust, Kotlin, Swift | Python, q |
Both are listed in Best Vector Database Hosting. On Inferse, KDB.AI scores higher on our published basis.