Chroma vs Marqo
| Chroma | Marqo | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | $250/mo | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Android, api, iOS, Linux, macOS, self-hosted, Web, Windows | Web |
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Paid from | 250 /mo | — |
| Deployment | both | cloud |
| Hybrid search | Yes | Yes |
| Metadata filtering | Yes | Yes |
| Sparse vectors | Yes | — |
| Maximum dimensions | 4,096 dimensions | — |
| Index types | VectorIndex, SparseVectorIndex, FtsIndex, StringInvertedIndex, IntInvertedIndex, FloatInvertedIndex, BoolInvertedIndex | — |
| SDK languages | Python, TypeScript, Rust, Kotlin, Swift | Python |
Both are listed in Best Vector Database Hosting, Best Search Databases. On Inferse, Chroma scores higher on our published basis.