Chroma vs turbopuffer
| Chroma | turbopuffer | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | $250/mo | $16/mo |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Android, api, iOS, Linux, macOS, self-hosted, Web, Windows | api, self-hosted, Web |
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Paid from | 250 /mo | 16 /mo |
| Deployment | both | both |
| Hybrid search | Yes | Yes |
| Metadata filtering | Yes | Yes |
| Sparse vectors | Yes | Yes |
| Maximum dimensions | 4,096 dimensions | 10,752 dimensions |
| Index types | VectorIndex, SparseVectorIndex, FtsIndex, StringInvertedIndex, IntInvertedIndex, FloatInvertedIndex, BoolInvertedIndex | SPFresh |
| SDK languages | Python, TypeScript, Rust, Kotlin, Swift | Python, TypeScript/JavaScript, Go, Java/Kotlin, Ruby, C#/.NET |
Both are listed in Best Vector Database Hosting, Best Search Databases. On Inferse, Chroma scores higher on our published basis.