Cisco Secure Access vs Pi-hole
| Cisco Secure Access | Pi-hole | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Free trial | Yes | No |
| Paid from | — | Free |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Android, api, iOS, Linux, macOS, Web, Windows | api, Linux, self-hosted, Web |
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Custom blocklists | Yes | Yes |
| Safe search controls | Yes | — |
| Filtering schedules | Yes | — |
| Activity reports | advanced | advanced |
| Platform support | Windows, macOS, Chrome OS, iOS, Android, DNS networks, Cisco network devices | Alpine, Armbian OS, Debian, CentOS Stream, Fedora, Raspberry Pi OS, Ubuntu; Docker and network DNS environments |
Both are listed in Best Internet Filtering Software, Best DNS Filtering Software. On Inferse, Pi-hole scores higher on our published basis.