conda vs Gleam
| conda | Gleam | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | No |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | — | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Linux, macOS, Windows | Linux, macOS, Windows |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Package formats | .conda, .tar.bz2 | Gleam, Erlang/rebar3, Elixir/Mix |
| Supported platforms | Windows, macOS, Linux | Linux, macOS, Windows; Erlang/OTP and JavaScript runtimes |
| Dependency resolution | Yes | Yes |
| Lockfile support | Yes | Yes |
| Private registry auth | Yes | No |
| Offline installation | Yes | — |
Both are listed in Best Package Managers. On Inferse, conda scores higher on our published basis.