Cosign vs GaraTrust
| Cosign | GaraTrust | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | Free | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Linux, macOS, self-hosted, Windows | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Supported targets | OCI container images, blobs, binaries, scripts, configuration files, SBOMs, WASM modules, Tekton bundles, eBPF modules, and In-Toto attestations | Windows Authenticode, Kernel/WHQL, MSI/MSIX, NuGet, PowerShell, ClickOnce, macOS, iOS, Android APK/AAB, Java JAR, Docker, Notary v2, Linux RPM, DEB, GPG, firmware/UEFI, PDF, XML/XAdES, SBOM |
| Certificate provided | Yes | — |
| Cloud signing | No | Yes |
| HSM key protection | Yes | Yes |
| Trusted timestamping | Yes | — |
| CI/CD signing | Yes | Yes |
| Approval workflows | — | Yes |
Both are listed in Best Code Signing Software. On Inferse, Cosign scores higher on our published basis.