Coverage.py vs NCover
| Coverage.py | NCover | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | Free | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | api, Linux, macOS, self-hosted, Windows | Windows |
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Coverage types | statement, branch | sequence point, branch, method, condition, symbol, line, cyclomatic complexity |
| Supported languages | Python | C#, VB.NET, C++/CLI, other .NET CLI languages |
| Report formats | text, HTML, XML, LCOV, JSON | HTML, XML, JSON, CSV, NCover v3 XML |
| Self-hosted option | Yes | Yes |
| Coverage gates | Yes | Yes |
| Historical trends | — | Yes |
Both are listed in Best Test Coverage Tools. On Inferse, Coverage.py scores higher on our published basis.