CVE Binary Tool vs FOSSA
| CVE Binary Tool | FOSSA | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Free trial | No | Yes |
| Paid from | — | $168392.50/mo |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Linux, Windows | api, Linux, self-hosted, Web |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Supported ecosystems | Dart (pubspec.lock); Go (go.mod); Java (pom.xml, JAR/WAR/EAR); JavaScript (package-lock.json, yarn.lock); OpenWrt opkg (.control); Perl (cpanfile); Python (requirements.txt, PKG-INFO, METADATA, .whl, .egg); Rust (Cargo.lock); Ruby (Gemfile.lock); R (renv.lock); Swift (Package.resolved); Windows PE (.pyd) | JavaScript/TypeScript, Java/Kotlin, Python, Go, Ruby, Rust, Clojure, Elixir, iOS/Objective-C/Swift, .NET, PHP, Dart, Erlang, Fortran, Haskell, Perl |
| SBOM generation | Yes | Yes |
| Pull request scanning | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment options | self_hosted | hybrid |
| Reachability analysis | — | Yes |
| Monitored projects | — | 10 projects |
Both are listed in Best Software Composition Analysis Software. On Inferse, FOSSA scores higher on our published basis.