Debezium vs Tungsten Replicator
| Debezium | Tungsten Replicator | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | No |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | — | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Windows, Linux | Linux |
| Change data capture | Yes | Yes |
| Replication direction | one-way | multi-way |
| Deployment options | self-hosted | hybrid |
| Supported databases | MariaDB, MySQL, PostgreSQL, MongoDB, SQL Server, Oracle, Db2, Cassandra, CockroachDB, Spanner, Vitess, Informix, Ingres, Milvus, YashanDB | MySQL, MariaDB, Percona, Amazon Aurora/RDS, Google Cloud SQL, Microsoft Azure, Oracle, PostgreSQL, Amazon Redshift, HPE Vertica, Hadoop, MongoDB, Apache Kafka, Amazon S3 |
| Data transformations | Yes | Yes |
| Cross-region replication | — | Yes |
Both are listed in Best Database Replication Software, Best Data Replication Software. On Inferse, Tungsten Replicator scores higher on our published basis.