Duplicate File Detective vs rmlint
| Duplicate File Detective | rmlint | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Free trial | Yes | No |
| Paid from | — | Free |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Windows | Linux, macOS, self-hosted |
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Paid from | 30 one-time | — |
| Platform coverage | windows | cross-platform |
| Scan locations | local drives; network shares; NAS devices; removable storage; file server shares | Local filesystem paths, mounted volumes, and file lists supplied through standard input |
| Match methods | file name; extension; file size; CRC32; MD5; SHA-1; SHA-256; SHA-512; byte-for-byte content; visual image comparison; document properties; audio tags | File hashes, exact byte-by-byte comparison, and optional basename or extension matching |
| File preview | Yes | Yes |
| Automatic selection | Yes | Yes |
| Recycle Bin / Trash | Yes | No |
| Folder exclusions | Yes | — |
Both are listed in Best Duplicate File Finders. On Inferse, rmlint scores higher on our published basis.