EclEmma vs LCOV
| EclEmma | LCOV | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | No |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | — | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Windows, macOS, Linux | Linux |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Coverage types | instruction, branch, line, method, type, cyclomatic complexity | line, function, branch, MC/DC |
| Supported languages | Java, Scala | C/C++, Perl, Python |
| Report formats | HTML, XML, CSV, JaCoCo execution data (.exec) | LCOV .info tracefiles, HTML |
| Self-hosted option | — | Yes |
| Historical trends | — | Yes |
| Coverage gates | — | Yes |
Both are listed in Best Test Coverage Tools. On Inferse, EclEmma scores higher on our published basis.