EclEmma vs MozJPEG
| EclEmma | MozJPEG | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | No |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | — | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Windows, macOS, Linux | api |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Coverage types | instruction, branch, line, method, type, cyclomatic complexity | line, branch, function |
| Supported languages | Java, Scala | Rust, C, C++, JavaScript, Go, Java, Kotlin |
| Report formats | HTML, XML, CSV, JaCoCo execution data (.exec) | LCOV, Coveralls, Coveralls+, covdir JSON, ActiveData-ETL, files, Markdown, HTML, Cobertura XML |
| Pull-request annotations | — | Yes |
Both are listed in Best Test Coverage Tools. On Inferse, MozJPEG scores higher on our published basis.