EngFlow Remote Caching vs NativeLink
| EngFlow Remote Caching | NativeLink | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Free trial | Yes | No |
| Paid from | Free | $15,000/mo |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | api, Linux, macOS, self-hosted, Web, Windows | Linux, macOS, self-hosted, Windows |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Cache scope | remote | both |
| Self-hosted option | Yes | Yes |
| Supported build systems | Bazel, BuildStream, Goma Server, Pants, Please, Recc, Soong, CMake, Gradle | Bazel, Buck2, Siso, Pants, BuildStream, CMake via recc, Soong, Goma |
| Compiler/language support | C/C++ with GCC, Clang, or MSVC; Java | C++, Rust, Python, Go, Java, Kotlin, Swift |
| CI platform support | GitHub Actions, Buildkite | GitHub Actions, GitLab, Buildkite, Jenkins |
| Remote execution | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | — | Yes |
Both are listed in Best Build Cache Software. On Inferse, EngFlow Remote Caching scores higher on our published basis.