Everlaw vs Logikcull
| Everlaw | Logikcull | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | No |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | — | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | api, Web | Web |
| Free plan | No | No |
| Deployment | vendor cloud | vendor cloud |
| Supported data sources | Microsoft 365, Zoom, Google Workspace, Purview, Asana, Jira, Slack, Zendesk, Salesforce, Box, Dropbox, Google Drive, SharePoint, OneDrive, ShareFile, Google Vault, native files, processed datasets | PST, EML, MSG, Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, Google Vault, Slack, Microsoft Teams, Box, Dropbox, PDFs, spreadsheets, images, audio, video, scanned documents |
| Native file viewer | Yes | — |
| Email threading | Yes | Yes |
| Automated redaction | Yes | Yes |
| Production formats | PDF, TIFF, PNG, JPEG, native files, TXT, DAT, CSV, OPT | DAT, OPT, LFP, native files, TIFF, PDF, custom slipsheets |
Both are listed in Best Legal eDiscovery Software, Best Legal Hold Software, Best eDiscovery Software. On Inferse, Everlaw scores higher on our published basis.