ExploitShield vs Zeta
| ExploitShield | Zeta | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | Free | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | self-hosted | — |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Server platforms | Paper, Spigot, Folia | Spigot |
| Minecraft versions | 1.17.x – 1.21.x | 1.13.2–26.1.2; tested major versions listed: 1.13–1.21 and 26.1 |
| Detection coverage | packet exploits, crash attempts, invalid NBT data, malicious payloads, duplication methods | AutoClicker, AutoTotem, BadPackets, BadPlace, Client-Brand, Criticals, FastBreak, Fly, Hitbox, InventoryWalk, Jesus, Jump, KillAura, Motion, NoClip, NoFall, NoSlow, Pattern, Reach, Scaffold, Speed, Spider, Spoofer, Strafe, Timer, Velocity |
| Enforcement actions | alert, cancel, kick, ban, IP ban, custom commands | Configurable penalties; delayed punishments |
| Replay analysis | No | — |
Both are listed in Best Minecraft Anti-Cheat Plugins. On Inferse, ExploitShield scores higher on our published basis.