Flatpak Builder vs fpm
| Flatpak Builder | fpm | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | Free | Free |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Linux | Linux, macOS, self-hosted |
| Target platforms | Linux | Debian, Ubuntu, Fedora, CentOS, RHEL, Arch Linux, FreeBSD, macOS, Solaris |
| Output formats | Flatpak application, OSTree repository | deb, rpm, solaris, freebsd, osxpkg, pacman, puppet, p5p, sh, tar, zip, dir |
| Command-line packaging | Yes | Yes |
| Silent installation | Yes | — |
| Auto-update support | Yes | — |
| Delta updates | Yes | — |
| CI/CD integration | Yes | — |
Both are listed in Best Software Packaging Tools. On Inferse, fpm scores higher on our published basis.