FourCore ATTACK vs Skyhawk Security BAS
| FourCore ATTACK | Skyhawk Security BAS | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | No |
| Free trial | No | Yes |
| Paid from | — | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Web | api, Web |
| Attack simulation modes | agent-based | agentless |
| Included attack surfaces | endpoint, email, WAF, network segmentation, SIEM, EDR, XDR, firewall, DLP | cloud architecture, cloud security controls, identities and permissions, vulnerabilities, attack paths, high-value cloud assets |
| MITRE ATT&CK mapping | Yes | Yes |
| Continuous scheduling | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment model | hybrid | cloud |
| Free plan | — | No |
| Custom attack scenarios | — | Yes |
Both are listed in Best Breach and Attack Simulation Software. On Inferse, Skyhawk Security BAS scores higher on our published basis.