Garnet vs Squid
| Garnet | Squid | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | Free | Free |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Linux, macOS, self-hosted, Windows | Linux, macOS, self-hosted, Windows |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment | self_hosted | self_hosted |
| Cache targets | application data, key-value data, strings, lists, sets, sorted sets, hashes | HTTP/HTTPS web pages and objects, FTP data, gopher data |
| Data persistence | Yes | Yes |
| High availability | Yes | Yes |
| Supported cache engines | RESP, Redis-compatible clients, Tsavorite | HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, gopher, ICP, HTCP |
Both are listed in Best Caching Software. On Inferse, Garnet scores higher on our published basis.