gcovr vs NCover
| gcovr | NCover | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | No |
| Free trial | No | Yes |
| Paid from | — | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Linux, macOS, Windows | extension, self-hosted, Windows |
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Coverage types | line, branch, decision, function, condition, call | sequence point, branch, method, condition, symbol, line, cyclomatic complexity |
| Supported languages | C, C++ | C#, VB.NET, C++/CLI, other .NET CLI languages |
| Report formats | text, HTML, CSV, JSON, Markdown, Clover XML, Cobertura XML, Coveralls JSON, JaCoCo XML, LCOV, SonarQube XML | HTML, XML, JSON, CSV, NCover v3 XML |
| Coverage gates | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hosted option | — | Yes |
| Historical trends | — | Yes |
Both are listed in Best Test Coverage Tools. On Inferse, gcovr scores higher on our published basis.