Gitleaks vs Kingfisher
| Gitleaks | Kingfisher | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | Free | Free |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Linux, macOS, self-hosted, Windows | Linux, macOS, self-hosted, Windows |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Supported VCS | GitHub, GitLab, Azure DevOps, Gitea, Bitbucket | Local Git, GitHub, GitLab, Azure Repos, Bitbucket, Gitea, Hugging Face |
| CI/CD scanning | Yes | Yes |
| Pre-commit scanning | Yes | Yes |
| Pull-request scanning | Yes | Yes |
| Custom detection rules | Yes | Yes |
| Push protection | — | Yes |
Both are listed in Best Secrets Scanning Software. On Inferse, Gitleaks scores higher on our published basis.