GoldFynch vs Onna
| GoldFynch | Onna | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | No |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | — | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Web | api, self-hosted, Web |
| Free plan | No | — |
| Paid from | 27 /mo | — |
| Deployment | vendor cloud | vendor cloud |
| Supported data sources | Browser uploads; ZIP archives; PST; MBOX; MSG; EML; PDF; Microsoft Word; Microsoft PowerPoint; Microsoft Excel; TIFF; BMP; JPEG; PNG; TXT; RTF; HTML; HTM; XML; FTP; email accounts; social media; cloud storage | Slack, Microsoft Teams, Outlook, Google Workspace, Zoom, Box, Dropbox, OneDrive, SharePoint, Amazon S3, Jira, Confluence, Salesforce, Zendesk, GitHub, Miro, Quip, custom internal systems, unsupported SaaS applications |
| Native file viewer | Yes | — |
| Email threading | Yes | — |
| Automated redaction | No | — |
| Production formats | Native; PDF; TIFF G4; JPEG; Concordance/Relativity-style load files | — |
| Included storage | 3 GB | — |
Both are listed in Best Legal eDiscovery Software, Best eDiscovery Software. On Inferse, Onna scores higher on our published basis.