Google Cloud Spanner vs turbopuffer
| Google Cloud Spanner | turbopuffer | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | No |
| Free trial | Yes | No |
| Paid from | — | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | api, Linux, self-hosted, Web | Web |
| Free plan | — | No |
| Paid from | — | 16 /mo |
| Deployment | — | both |
| Hybrid search | — | Yes |
| Metadata filtering | — | Yes |
| Sparse vectors | — | Yes |
| Maximum dimensions | — | 10,752 dimensions |
| Index types | — | SPFresh |
| SDK languages | — | Python, TypeScript/JavaScript, Go, Java/Kotlin, Ruby, C#/.NET |
Both are listed in Best Vector Database Hosting. On Inferse, Google Cloud Spanner scores higher on our published basis.